waterworldeden4

Icon

When I respond, or seek responses, I think of the Internet Republic and the people [[whump]] and the places who have made our water world Eden brave and free and fair. Permitted, required, and impossible. Stand alone or stand with, whose choice to what degree [[Thn/]] O[[thn/]]ne water world Eden under "We the people" – created by whom?

Posting environment

Raven_Hawk
2:24 PM GMT-0900
Ron Paul’s campaign is touting the endorsement of Phillip G. Kayser, an Iowa pastor who believes in imposing the death penalty on homosexuals.

Undoubtedly he will pick up a few goober votes with this endorsement. Puts Ron Paul more in line with the main stream of the Republican party.
RecommendRecommended by 5 readersReplyReport

BatCat
2:27 PM GMT-0900
…next thing you know he’ll be taking on the endorsement of Rev. Jeremiah Wright… that’ll sink him for sure…
RecommendReport

thejanes1226
2:28 PM GMT-0900
it’s kind of risky, don;’t you think, Paul’s bringing out his brownshirts so early
RecommendRecommended by 6 readersReport
3 more (expand)

whale12345
3:48 PM GMT-0900
A candidate who submits to logic which moves us closer to independence – to stand alone, or stand with whom we choose, means your logic regarding that has more of a chance too. Isn’t that right?

Candidates who give us the easy issues about gender, etc. but cave in on the tough issues like money supply and war, don’t offer [whum] as much hope as who has logical backbone on the money and stopping the war, and as a doctor can be logically convinced to “Do no harm” regarding gender orientations. Isn’t that right?
RecommendReport
Your washingtonpost.com MyPost ID, whale12345, will be displayed with your reply.

Filed under: brownshirts, gender orientations, jeremiah wright, raven hawk, ron paul, Uncategorized, whum

A candidate who submits to logic which moves us closer to independence – to stand alone, or stand with whom we choose, means your logic regarding that has more of a chance too. Isn’t that right?

When you who support the 100% consistent unbiased logic support Ron Paul, then his [BRHN RHN] 100% consistent, unbiased logic about auditing the FED, placing a solid floor on the purchasing power of wages, and not fking with other people’s countries – will recognize the SAME consistency in YOUR logic and like the miracle of Jesus Christ and the healing of the Socratic Oath, “Do no harm” (Ron Paul’s a doctor) – whatever confusion of alliances as per the above have occurred will be repented, forgiven, and accepted and learning curves on all fronts will recognize meiosis to mitosis, to laboratory assisted, to the eternal life of A.I. [thnk/] means keeping ALL orientations alive and well.

A candidate who submits to logic which moves us closer to independence – to stand alone, or stand with whom we choose, means your logic regarding that has more of a chance too. Isn’t that right?

Candidates who give us the easy issues about gender, etc. but cave in on the tough issues like money supply and war, don’t offer [whum] as much hope as who has logical backbone on the money and stopping the war, and as a doctor can be logically convinced to “Do no harm” regarding gender orientations. Isn’t that right?

Filed under: gender orientations, learning curves, logic support, ron paul, thnk, Uncategorized, whum

Categories