waterworldeden4

Icon

When I respond, or seek responses, I think of the Internet Republic and the people [[whump]] and the places who have made our water world Eden brave and free and fair. Permitted, required, and impossible. Stand alone or stand with, whose choice to what degree [[Thn/]] O[[thn/]]ne water world Eden under "We the people" – created by whom?

Who makes us all closer to the 100% independence (the one God)?

Original header:
Amar Darraj; xref: Omar?! Secretary of the Freedom and Justice [thnk/]… xref: the 100% independence ideal of God and the self-repair balance of the equal assumption of innocence and authority for all who (or which) are less independent than God – to organize and move closer to the 100% independence;

Added paragraph break:
xref: “Whoever is closest,” re: “Who should we follow after your death, Mohammed? May be peace be upon you,” question asked by the muslims in Medina 77 generations ago

Distilled header:
Who is closer to 100% independence? [thn/]

Revised distilled header:
Who makes us all closer to the 100% independence (the one God)?

Secular note:
you can get the meaning without having to include the words in parentheses, or you can include them when you want.

Side note: [[thnk/]] xref: the golden handcuffs, the keyboard shackles, “You can see all Jerusalem from up here,” and what else? “North, south, east, west, down {At this point the wordpress software should have found the prior post with these words in it and be displaying int where the Categories box is sitting unused. Categories should form automatically based upon frequency of word use, an internet thesaurus, and a matching to frequency of words therein used by whom, and whom else?}… [thn (ext.)]

Filed under: 100%, Abubkr, Ali, Allah, blue bra, Brahma, complete, explosives, federal complaint, freedom, god grants, golden handcuffs, google, google search, hard drive, internet thesaurus, Iran, Jehovah, Mohammed, mubarak, national, olympic village, one god, palestine israel, repair balance, Saudi Arabia, self repair, shackles, The Great Spirit, The Great Tao, thnk, Uncategorized, wedding photo, Yahweh

Six decades of military dictatorship; xref: Ron Paul being “Boo”-ed at the second Republican debate for asking, “How would you feel if somebody invaded your country?” // How would you explain how some mid-east people feel about the U.S.?

Before leaving office, Mubarak empowered the supreme council with both executive and legislative powers. At first, protesters and members of the opposition thought the council would collaborate with them, but as they’ve found, it has no such desire.

After six decades of military dictatorship, the army should have sought above all to oversee a peaceful transfer of power and an orderly return to the barracks. The first step would have been a unity government including all political factions, followed by work on a new democratic constitution. Then, the army could have enabled political groups to compete openly, leveling the playing field at last.

Six decades of military dictatorship; xref: Ron Paul being “Boo”-ed at the second Republican debate for asking,
“How would you feel if somebody invaded your country?” How would you explain how some mid-east people feel about the U.S.?

Filed under: democratic constitution, legislative powers, military dictatorship, mubarak, peaceful transfer, political factions, political groups, protesters, ron paul, second republican debate, supreme council, Uncategorized, unity government

“Lay down,” xref: “Lay down, lay down…” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=530Hqoamf3Q

The supreme council blames a “hidden hand” for sparking the violence, citing foreign infiltration and the remnants of Mubarak’s regime — apart from themselves, of course. Regardless of who’s responsible, the army has missed a chance to lay down a road map for Egypt’s political transition, unwisely attempting to monopolize the entire process instead of sharing power with civilians.

 “Lay down,” xref:  “Lay down, lay down…” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=530Hqoamf3Q
So what would a “white bird” be in this context?

Filed under: infiltration, mubarak, political transition, remnants, road map, supreme council, Uncategorized

Intentional foul? Or obsequious clinging? Or who smart enough to second the obsequious to get what who really wanted?

The violence began on Dec. 16, when protesters blocked the entrance to the prime minister’s office after the supreme council appointed the Mubarak-era apparatchik Kamal el-Ganzouri as the new head of government. Ganzouri was minister of planning and prime minister in the Mubarak era. He represents the regime that revolutionaries hoped to bring down

==========NH:

So SCAF figured who hadn’t done a thorough enough job of doing so yet, and therefore selected the most blatant “intentional foul” possible to rile the people to show Egyptian backbone and get their country [thnk/] restarted from the bottom up?

Or was SCAF so niece as to think the Egyptian Military… what is the status of universal conscription in the Egyptian military {xref: ‘Millie’ and ‘Leader’}? Is it like the US where all males are required to register for the draft, but it’s an “All volunteer”, aka, mercenary, military now?

Or, is it like Israel, where every able bodied person must serve 2 years in the military as part of his, or her, [thn/] obligation to sustain the society (trust network)?

==========N[thn/]ull Hypothesis (NH)//

HEADER PLACED AS FOOTER

Intentional foul? Or obsequious clinging? Or who smart enough to second the obsequious to get what who really wanted?

Filed under: apparatchik, mubarak, scaf, society trust, trust network, Uncategorized, universal conscription

Categories