waterworldeden4

Icon

When I respond, or seek responses, I think of the Internet Republic and the people [[whump]] and the places who have made our water world Eden brave and free and fair. Permitted, required, and impossible. Stand alone or stand with, whose choice to what degree [[Thn/]] O[[thn/]]ne water world Eden under "We the people" – created by whom?

WANTED: More fair, constitutional behavioral warnings from Social Network Hosts; xref: “Lead us not into dependency, but deliver (rescue) us when our Independence is leading us astray,” (“The Lord’s Prayer” Scientific Method translation WLH / haji MAO 2012 – all rights reserved {Ha, ha,}

Fair first amendment effort? Screen Shot 2011-12-26 at 4.44.18 AM

Fair first amendment effort? Screen Shot 2011-12-26 at 4.44.18 AM [[Thn/]] “Yeah, that’s why we get along, Alhumdullilah,” {{Halleliujah}}

I share art & ideas w/ NYTimes.com. Jill Abramson is a classmate, though merit, not nepotism [rhrnrhrn…] is why I contact you. Sorry I’m not interested much in middle age. Archiving, last will & testament, & a good last tour of duty. Linked in referred you to me

– William / haji Moham Hale / Omar

Linked In Intimidation Screen Shot 2011-12-26 at 4.44.30 AM

Linked In Intimidation Screen Shot 2011-12-26 at 4.44.30 AM

HEADER PLACED AS FOOTER
WANTED: More fair, constitutional behavioral warnings from Social Network Hosts; xref: “Lead us not into dependency, but deliver (rescue) us when our Independence is leading us toward false short cuts which save us steps, but making unnecessary steps for others*,” (“The Lord’s Prayer” Scientific Method translation WLH / haji MAO 2012 – all rights reserved {Ha, ha,}

*including ourselves later; xref: Social [thn/]…

tools need to fairly, freely, effectively, and securely allocate responsibility and control for communionication in the hands of the members / citizens… NOT Network pre-emptive intimidation policies which cause treadmills of fear, doubt, and suspicion, instead of the branching expansion of SELF determination…

xref: Self correcting, self educating, collaboratively SELF governing people.

xref; DCDelegate.com

“Count people, don’t intimidate people – people count,”

So statistics on the 1+ parade who scrolls past your right margin, and statistics on the LinkedIn offers of contact … and the degree to which you check whom out, or simply let them know YOUR door is open…

xref: People with weapons of mass destruction should live in glass houses; xref: political activists work in that realm, therefore, letting people know YOUR door is open is essential..

Filed under: jill abramson, moham, nepotism, network hosts, nytimes, share art, Uncategorized

Linked in brought you to my attention… {{A “Do not disturb” message was generated from “I do not know…” but at least it advised to go back to whose profile; xref: the idea to require one round trip communication to permit whom to get in. perhaps two.

LinkedIn brought you to my attention, but then told me I couldn't respond to you unless I knew you - not my idea of politeness, or good mental health; tension created by responses not unpainted (expressed). No on and off switch for the LinkedIn unrequested offers. No welcome mat settings to let you link so I can know you're interested in watching whose glass house. No further voice, er, choice, to show you're open to a call back. Simply intimidation. Sure it might jog whose memory, but it also creates memories in who has to see the picture (Every picture tells a story) - and then it denies whom the right to respond to what who has experienced?! Mental illness personified. [thnk/] Screen Shot 2011-12-26 at 6.07.32 AM

LinkedIn brought you to my attention, but then told me I couldn’t respond to you unless I knew you – not my idea of politeness, or good mental health; tension created by responses not unpainted (expressed). No on and off switch for the LinkedIn unrequested offers. No welcome mat settings to let you link so I can know you’re interested in watching whose glass house. No further voice, er, choice, to show you’re open to a call back. Simply intimidation. Sure it might jog whose memory, but it also creates memories in who has to see the picture (Every picture tells a story) – and then it denies whom the right to respond to what who has experienced?! Mental illness personified. [thnk/] Screen Shot 2011-12-26 at 6.07.32 AM

'People you MIGHT know', plaintiff vs. 'People you MAY know', defendant - Screen Shot 2011-12-26 at 6.14.54 AM

“People you MIGHT know,” vs. “People you MAY know,” sounds like LinkedIn is aware [thn/]

Peace upon you, how are you? LinkedIn brought you to my attention. I’d like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.

– William / haji Moham Hale / Omar

Linked in brought you to my attention… {{A “Do not disturb” message was generated from “I do not know…” but at least it advised to go back to whose profile; xref: the idea to require one round trip communication to permit whom to get in. perhaps two.

LinkedIn brought you to my attention, SL. I do a lot of reading and responding at NYTimes.com, and LinkedIn mentioned your bio had NYTimes, London in it. I’d like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.

– William / haji Moham Hale / Omar

Filed under: haji, linkedin, moham, nytimes, peace upon, professional network, Uncategorized

Categories