waterworldeden4

Icon

When I respond, or seek responses, I think of the Internet Republic and the people [[whump]] and the places who have made our water world Eden brave and free and fair. Permitted, required, and impossible. Stand alone or stand with, whose choice to what degree [[Thn/]] O[[thn/]]ne water world Eden under "We the people" – created by whom?

December 29, 2011

Dear ,

Thank you for contacting my office. I look forward to researching your issue and responding to you in a timely manner. The involvement of my constituents helps me represent them in the best possible manner.

In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact my office if you have any questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Congressman Tom Reed

NY-29

This e-mail may contain PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL information and is intended only for the use of the specific individual(s) to whom it is addressed.

=============NH:
Under the first amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, the individual (s) to whom this email is addressed have unabridged rights to copy, store, retransmit, share, and respond to this email as well as the legal right to hold the sender accountable [thn/] for the information conned herein.
===========Null Hypothesis//

It may contain information that is privileged and confidential under state and federal law.

=============NH:
Any claims of legal “privilege” or “confidentiality” made regarding this transmittal must conform to the first amendment and all other parts of the constitution of the United States. Please do not feel intimidated regarding your right to share the information herein with your family, friends, legal counsel, business associates, church, social network, or other sources of your decision making.
============Null Hypothesis//

This information may be used or disclosed only in accordance with law, and you may be subject to penalties under law for improper use or further disclosure of the information in this e-mail.

==============NH:
Under the constitution of the United States of America, unless you have specifically signed a non- [rotating wing] [thnk/] disclosure, or similar agreement PRIOR to receipt of this email, you are entitled to your full rights to use the information contained herein in any truthful [[thnk/]] way you so choose.
============NH//

This information may be used and disclosed

============NH:
It looks like you’re missing a period here, who. Is this your idea of all it should say? “This information may be used and disclosed”? It certainly is an intimida[thn/]ting and “chilling” footnote to your otherwise kind email. Could such a harsh warning be an intentional foul? Or do you really believe a US Congressman should be intimidating email constituents like this?
=========NH//

If you have received this e-mail in error, please let our office know and then delete this email.

============NH:
If you have received this e-mail in error, please let our office know. Retain this email for your records. You may need it in a court of law as evidence.*
=============NH//

Thank you.

===========NH:
*Footnote: Dear Congressman from the 29th district of N.Y. Please institute the normal practice of requiring email address verification before you send emails to people. Normally who is required to click on a link in an email he, or she, receives to verify it is in fact they who have made the request. This oversight on your part, coupled with your unsolicited legal advice to delete this email, which would be needed in a court of law should who care to complain about being harassed due to your negligence in screening email address inputs, could make you liable for negligence, or worse, cause you to loose an election when who times a midnight raid that results in batches of emails being sent out by your office to people who never asked for them.

Would I have spent all this time writing you if I didn’t love you? And the Constitution of the United States – what ‘s left of it.

Speaking of which, – please do not divide the US in half with a north south pipe line – instead get on board with us for east west and west east fresh water pipelines from coastal distillation plants. And extend the Smithsonian mall to Santa Barbara.

Thanks

Bill / Mohammed
202-465-0067
================NH//

HEADER PLACED AS FOOTER
Response to your [rotating wing] intimidation and instructions, TR, regarding my [thn/] U.S. Constitutional right to discuss whatever I hear or see with anyone I choose – unless I sign an agreement PRIOR to so hearing or seeing.

Filed under: destruction of evidence, disclaimer, email, Facebook, first amendment, Jesus, one sided, pipeline, Process comment, recipients rights, sender's liability, side note, Social (Trust) Networks, Stand alone rights, Stand with rights, The five (5) pillars of faith, Tom Reed, Uncategorized, WIC, Women's rights, Zakat

Why? First. Only. Simple[thn//]st.

Why is Ikhwanweb, the Muslim Brotherhood web site, the first and only web site where who has found a “text to speech” offer? At the time of installation of the Mac OSX, Apple makes a complicated, time sucking offer of “Voice Over Utility” (xref: “If you already know …else learn), but this Ikhwanweb offer requires only that text be highlighted (selected). xref: fear of visual asset interest groups? http://vozme.com/bookmarklet.php?lang=en

vozMe
Home | Webmasters | Speech in your browser
Español | English | More languages
Add text-to-speech to your browser

vozMe lets you add a speech synthesis bookmarlet to your browser.
Install the bookmarklet
Select any text as you browse, click the vozMe button in your browser and you will hear the text.
Install the bookmarklet

Male voice: vozMe | Female voice: vozMe
iGoogle gadget | Facebook widget
Add speech to your browser | Add speech to your website
Privacy policy | Licenses | Contact
EmailShareThis

Why? First. Only. Simple[thn//]st.

Filed under: female voice, male voice, muslim brotherhood, Process comment, speech synthesis, thn, website privacy policy,

Categories