waterworldeden4

Icon

When I respond, or seek responses, I think of the Internet Republic and the people [[whump]] and the places who have made our water world Eden brave and free and fair. Permitted, required, and impossible. Stand alone or stand with, whose choice to what degree [[Thn/]] O[[thn/]]ne water world Eden under "We the people" – created by whom?

Intentional foul? Or obsequious clinging? Or who smart enough to second the obsequious to get what who really wanted?

The violence began on Dec. 16, when protesters blocked the entrance to the prime minister’s office after the supreme council appointed the Mubarak-era apparatchik Kamal el-Ganzouri as the new head of government. Ganzouri was minister of planning and prime minister in the Mubarak era. He represents the regime that revolutionaries hoped to bring down

==========NH:

So SCAF figured who hadn’t done a thorough enough job of doing so yet, and therefore selected the most blatant “intentional foul” possible to rile the people to show Egyptian backbone and get their country [thnk/] restarted from the bottom up?

Or was SCAF so niece as to think the Egyptian Military… what is the status of universal conscription in the Egyptian military {xref: ‘Millie’ and ‘Leader’}? Is it like the US where all males are required to register for the draft, but it’s an “All volunteer”, aka, mercenary, military now?

Or, is it like Israel, where every able bodied person must serve 2 years in the military as part of his, or her, [thn/] obligation to sustain the society (trust network)?

==========N[thn/]ull Hypothesis (NH)//

HEADER PLACED AS FOOTER

Intentional foul? Or obsequious clinging? Or who smart enough to second the obsequious to get what who really wanted?

Filed under: apparatchik, mubarak, scaf, society trust, trust network, Uncategorized, universal conscription

Categories